Islamabad’s anti‑terrorism court formally disposed of a petition filed by Imaan and Hadi on Saturday, rejecting their challenge to the application of terrorism‑related provisions in a security‑breach case. The hearing, presided over by Judge Sipra, took place in the capital’s Federal Anti‑Terrorism Court (ATC) and was adjourned until the following Monday.
Both accused appeared before the bench through a video‑link system, a measure adopted to preserve courtroom security while ensuring their participation. During the session the court documented the statements of three prosecution witnesses, whose testimonies are expected to reinforce the charges of violating anti‑terrorism statutes.
The petition sought relief on the grounds that the terrorism provisions invoked against the duo were inappropriate for the alleged offence, which centres on a breach of security protocols at a government‑linked facility. By dismissing the plea, the judiciary signalled its willingness to apply stringent anti‑terrorism laws to cases that threaten national safety, even when the alleged act does not involve direct violence.
Legal experts note that the decision underscores the courts’ expanding role in curbing activities deemed detrimental to public order, especially in a climate where security concerns dominate the national agenda. The upcoming Monday hearing will likely focus on the admissibility of further evidence and may determine whether the case proceeds to trial.
The use of video‑link technology in the proceedings reflects a broader shift in Pakistani courts toward leveraging digital tools to balance procedural fairness with the need for heightened security in sensitive cases.