Key points:
- FBR Chairman Rashid Mahmood Langrial is reviewing the recent spike in advance income‑tax notices sent to salaried workers.
- A draft measure could waive advance‑tax liability for employees whose only earnings come from a salary.
- If adopted, the exemption would provide immediate cash relief to a sizeable segment of Pakistan’s wage‑earning population.
- Business federations and tax specialists are closely tracking the proposal, citing both potential benefits and implementation challenges.
The Federal Board of Revenue has taken note of a sharp increase in advance‑tax assessments issued to individuals whose sole source of income is their monthly salary. Under the current framework, the FBR can demand a pre‑payment of tax on projected earnings, a practice that many employees argue places an undue financial strain on households that lack alternative revenue streams such as rents, dividends, or freelance work.
In response, Chairman Langrial is reportedly considering a policy that would exempt “pure” salaried taxpayers from the advance‑tax requirement. The move aims to lighten the immediate cash‑flow pressure on millions of public‑sector staff, private‑sector employees, and junior professionals who rely exclusively on fixed wages. By removing the advance payment, these workers would retain more of their take‑home pay until the final tax liability is calculated at year‑end.
Economists note that the proposed relief could boost disposable income for a large swath of the middle class, potentially spurring consumer spending in a sluggish economic environment. However, employer bodies such as the Federation of Pakistan Chambers of Commerce have cautioned that any amendment must be clearly defined to avoid confusion in payroll processing and to ensure compliance across diverse industries.
Tax experts also point out that the exemption would need to be balanced against the revenue objectives of the FBR, which has been under pressure to broaden the tax base and reduce fiscal deficits. A phased rollout or a threshold‑based approach may be explored to safeguard collections while still delivering meaningful relief to those most affected by the current advance‑tax regime.

